Twitterrific web client mac#

If you want to win those users back, you need to investigate letting power users use the web platform in the same way. Customizability is why power users use tools like third party clients. I want to be able to scroll the way I want, not the way you want me to use your platform. I want to get a simple timeline with conversations that don’t expand until I click on them. I don’t want to see interesting tweets from people I don’t follow. I don’t want to see what my followers liked on someone else’s timeline.

Let Users Customize Their Experience – If you’re going to drive me to the website, let me choose how I view my tweets.

Sometimes we have to put up with the noise to keep the signal. It’s going to clog our timeline but it would also finance a usable client. Give API access to Tweetbot and Twitterific, but in order to qualify for a reduced rate they have to start displaying ads and promoted tweets from Twitter.

Enforce Ads on Third Party Clients – I hate this idea, but if it’s what it takes to restore functionality, so be it.

If you want people to continue to develop good features that you’ll “borrow” later, you need to give them access to your client. Don’t force the developers working hard to make your service usable to foot the bills that you think you should be getting. If you don’t want to maintain the old code, then give API access to these third party developers at the rates they used to have it.

Restore API Access to Third Party Clients – This is a no-brainer for Twitter.

But I wanted to take a moment to talk about some things that I think Twitter should do to get their power users back on their side. I came up with a huge list of things I didn’t like. I was a little animated because I’m tired of getting screwed by developers that don’t use Twitter the way that I use it. You probably heard my rant on the Gestalt IT Rundown this week. How can Twitter live in a world where no one wants to use their tools but can’t use the tools they like because access to the vital APIs that run them are choked off behind a paywall that no one wants to pay for? How can us poor users continue to use a service that sucks when used through the preferred web portal? They have left Tweetdeck in a state that’s barely usable, positioning it for power users.

Twitterrific web client mac#

They’ve already killed off their Mac client. But it’s not just a war on Tweetbot and Twitterific. And that means choking off third party clients. They need to get people to the Twitter website where these things can be displayed. Twitter needs real users looking at ads and sponsored things to get customers to pay for them. Sadly for Twitter, those celebrities are moving to platforms like Instagram as Twitter becomes overrun with bots and loses the ability to have discourse about topics. Twitter wants to court celebrities with huge followings that want to put sponsored tweets in their faces. The more users they have active the more eyeballs they can get on their ads and sponsored tweets and hashtags. And how is Twitter supposed to make money in today’s climate?

And if you aren’t turning a profit you’re a loser that people will abandon. Wall Street doesn’t care about user interface or API accessibility. I’m among the people that are frustrated that Twitter is chasing the dollar instead of the users. Twitter power users have been voicing their opinions with the hashtag #BreakingMyTwitter. Users of popular programs like Tweetbot and Twitterific were forced to degrade client functionality thanks to the implementation of these changes. You can imagine the feedback that Twitter has gotten. This new API structure also has a hefty price tag. They’re forcing these clients to use their new API structure for things like notifications and removing support for streaming.

Twitter is finally cutting off access to their API that third party clients have been using for the past few years. This time, it’s the implementation of changes announced back in May. It’s no surprise that Twitter’s developers are messing around with the platform.